Prospecting
B2B Sales Prospecting
Most B2B prospecting problems get diagnosed as activity problems, so teams respond by sending more. Occasionally that's right. Far more often the team is already sending plenty, and the issue is that almost none of it reads like it was written for the person receiving it.
Published 18 August 2026
Relevance is the whole job
A buyer decides whether to keep reading in about two seconds, and they're not judging your product — they're judging whether you appear to understand their situation. Everything else in prospecting, across every channel, is downstream of that. Cadence design, subject-line craft and call openers all matter far less than whether the underlying observation is specific to this company and this person.
Target fewer accounts, properly
Most lists are too long to be worked well. When a seller has four hundred accounts, research is impossible, so they default to templated outreach — which produces poor results, which usually leads to someone adding more accounts. A shorter list, chosen because there's a plausible reason those companies would care right now, is what makes real preparation possible at all.
Research the situation, not the trivia
Congratulating someone on a funding round is not research; it's proof you can read a headline. Useful preparation answers a different question: based on what this company is doing, what's likely to be hard for someone in this role right now, and what would make them think "how do they know that?"
- What has changed recently — hiring, structure, product, market, leadership
- What that change usually creates as a problem for someone in this role
- What they're likely already doing about it
- Why this would be worth their time this month rather than at some point
Say the observation before the pitch
Most outreach opens with who you are and what you sell, then works backwards to relevance. Reverse it. Lead with what you noticed and what you suspect that means for them, and let the reason you're contacting them come second. The point isn't to be clever — it's that the buyer can tell within a line whether this was written for them or run off a template.
Channels don't change the problem
Phone, email and LinkedIn have different etiquette and different rhythms, and none of that rescues a message with nothing specific to say. A call is more forgiving of a rough opener because you can adapt live; an email is less forgiving because it gets one shot. But the failure mode is identical across all three: generic.
Where AI helps, and where it doesn't
AI is genuinely useful in prospecting for the part sellers skip: understanding a company and a role quickly, summarising what's changed, pulling together context that used to take twenty minutes. Where it backfires is generation — used to mass-produce outreach, it makes everything slightly smoother and completely interchangeable, at a moment when buyers are already saturated with exactly that. Use it to think faster, not to write more.
Measure what leads to conversations
Activity metrics are easy to collect and easy to hit without doing the job well. If the only number anyone watches is volume, teams will optimise for volume. Look at reply quality and conversations booked alongside it, and review actual messages regularly — the fastest way to improve a team's prospecting is to read what they're really sending.
FAQs
Common questions
- Is cold calling still worth doing in B2B?
- Yes, where it fits the market and the buyer. It has an advantage no written channel has: you can adapt in real time to what the person says. The reason it's often dismissed is that it's usually done as a scripted pitch rather than a conversation, and that version genuinely doesn't work well.
- How many touches should a prospecting sequence have?
- Fewer, better touches generally beat longer sequences of thin ones. Persistence matters, but a ten-step cadence where steps three to ten say nothing new mostly trains the buyer to ignore you. If you can't say something worth reading at step six, the sequence is too long.
- Should SDRs and AEs prospect differently?
- The behaviour is the same; the context differs. SDRs work more volume and need research that's fast and repeatable, while AEs prospecting into their own patch usually have deeper account knowledge to draw on. Both fail in the same way when relevance gets sacrificed to activity targets.
More on prospecting
Want this working inside your team?
Book a free sales review and we'll find the simplest change that moves your numbers.
